Exploration Nine – Of Your Own Design
Through the semester, I am most proud of my profile
essay Priscilla Mead: Feminism and
Legislature. Due to the fact that it is much too long to
post to the blog, I’ll share my beginning paragraph.
Prior to and throughout the early 1960’s a
remarkable woman was defined, through society’s fallacious lens, as stated in
the beginning of Mona Lisa Smile, a provocative period piece on feminism set in
the 1950’s, “It is our duty, nay, our obligation to reclaim our place in the home,
bearing the children that will carry our traditions into the future, [so that
women may once again fulfill] the roles they were born to fill… [Remember] the
only grade that matters is the one he gives you” (Mona Lisa Smile, 2003). Today, a remarkable women is defined by her
intelligence, achievements, and most importantly her integrity and
character. Though the battle of feminism
is not over, women in the 21st century are truly blessed to have the
opportunities throughout their lives and to have access to the education that
allows them to choose any career path they aspire to follow that will lead them
to success. Being an exceptional woman
still takes much effort, but because of an aspiration, a discipline, and a
successful endeavor it is possible to gain recognition and to become a
remarkable woman due to the struggle and perseverance of strong women who paved
the way before us; women like Priscilla Mead.
The reason I chose to share my opening
paragraph is because it contains my thesis, which will undoubtedly give a quick
understanding as to my essay topic. What
made essay one my favorite, and in my opinion, best piece of work from this semester
is because it provided the opportunity to connect with an acquaintance,
Priscilla Mead, who is a retired female politician.
As the world shifts toward new forms of
energy, it is necessary to understand the ramifications it may cause. A topic that I feel holds importance, as I
have been researching it this semester, in today’s ever growing society is
environmental racism. At the most basic
level, environmental racism is the placement of hazardous waste and dangerous
technologies within or in proximity to socioeconomically oppressed
populations. There are many factors that
play significant roles when discussing environmental racism, but the two that I
will discuss is socioeconomic status, and environmental justice. When you reference socioeconomic status in
relation to environmental racism you are generally referring to those
containing “lower socioeconomic status in terms of education, poverty,
unemployment and of speaking a native language” (Huyser, Sakamoto, and Takei,
541-42). Another factor that is
significant when looking at environmental racism is the defining of environmental
justice by the EPA which states: “that no socioeconomic group should bare a disproportionate
share of the negative environmental consequences resulting from industrial,
municipal, and commercial operations” (“The Principles of Environmental Justice”,
2). It is pertinent to be aware that
though each demographic group has their own statistics in socioeconomic status that
each should bare equal amounts of the “negative environmental consequences” (“The
Principles of Environmental Justice”).
Unfortunately, with an ever expanding population, and the need for new
forms of energy, environmental racism is occurring around the globe, and those
of a lesser socioeconomic status are baring an unequal share of hazardous energy
waste.
Works
Cited
Huyser,
Kimberly R., Arthur Sakamoto, and Isao Takei. "The Persistence of Racial
Disadvantage: The Socioeconomic Attainments of Single-Race and Multi-Race
Native Americans." Population Research and Policy Review 29.4
(2010): 541-68. Web.
"Principles of Environmental Justice." Principles
of Environmental Justice. N.p., 24-27 Oct. 1991. Web. 08 Dec. 2014.
http://www.ejnet.org/ej/principles.html.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.